Application of a Round Three-Legged Table

1. The measurable mechanical effect (observed movement, tipping, or rotation of the table).

2. The hypothetical/psychological effect (evaluating potential non-contact or anomalous force application).

Description of the test parameters:

The baseline model assumes a circular table with the following parameters:

• Table Mass: m = 6.0 kg
• Table Diameter: d = 0.50 m
• Distance between legs (Table B): d_B = 0.50 m

---

1. Force Required to Tilt the Table

Gravitational force acting on the mass:

To tilt the table, the overturning moment about the pivot point (the outer leg) must exceed the restoring gravitational moment.

Distance from center of gravity to the tipping pivot point:

r = 0.25 m

Height of force application point on the tabletop:

h = 0.70 m

Overturning condition (Static Equilibrium Boundary):

Mass equivalent load:

This represents the minimum threshold force (21.02 N applied horizontally at h = 0.70 m) required to initiate tipping in this model.

---

2. Rotation of the Table

Applied Torque (Moment):

If a tangential force of F_tan = 5.0 N is applied at the outer edge (r = 0.25 m):

Moment of Inertia (assuming uniform thin disk approximation):

Angular Acceleration:

---

3. Horizontal Displacement

Assuming a coefficient of static friction between the table legs and the floor of:

μ_s = 0.35

Friction Resistance Force:

Minimum horizontal force required to cause sliding:

Equivalent thrust mass load:

---

4. General Telekinetic Model

If the observed physical manifestation (force or torque) is modeled phenomenologically as:

Where:

• K = Physical transfer constant / Coupling efficiency
• C = Focus / Intent / Mental Coherence factor
• S = Sender potential / Object susceptibility parameter

This equation provides a conceptual abstraction that must be calibrated experimentally against measured physical displacements.

---

5. Spirit Identification Index (SI) & Combined Model

To evaluate whether the observed physical movement carries intelligent communication rather than random noise, we introduce a quantitative accuracy metric:

Where:

• N_a = Number of correct/intended response signals
• N_q = Total number of query signals

Score Index Range:

A highly coherent test outcome yields, for example:

Combined Physical-Informational Indicator:

To quantify the combined magnitude of the physical movement and its informational coherence, we define the Effective Targeted Force Index (F_eff):

While the mechanical equations (Sections 1–3) define the observed physical forces (F_obs in Newtons), the Spirit Identification Index (SI) scales this force according to its informational accuracy. This integrates both physical mechanics and informational intentionality into a unified empirical metric.