1. Non-Harm Principle

No information may be shared publicly if it can cause harm to living individuals, families, or persons connected to a case. This includes reputational, emotional, social, or legal harm.

2. Respect for Victims & Families

All communications are handled with utmost respect for victims and their families. Telepathic impressions are not treated as statements or claims and are never used to pressure or influence individuals affected by a case.

3. Privacy Protection

Personal details, names, or contextual information that could identify individuals are handled with extreme caution. Redaction is applied whenever necessary to ensure privacy for everyone involved.

4. Neutrality & Non-Accusation

No telepathic or PK-derived information is used to name suspects, imply guilt, or direct blame. The work does not replace investigation, forensic analysis, or legal procedure. Neutrality is maintained at all times.

5. Documentation Integrity

All impressions are documented exactly as received. No interpretation, expansion, or narrative is added. PK confirmations are recorded in the order and form they occur (1 thud = yes, 2 = no, 3 = maybe).

Documentation reflects only what is received, nothing more.

6. Minimal Disclosure

Only the minimum necessary information is ever released publicly—and only when ethically justified or required by developments. Details that could mislead, speculate, or produce unintended interpretations are withheld.

7. Voluntary Boundaries

Sessions may be paused or ended at any time. Telepathic impressions and PK responses are not pursued beyond what feels ethically or personally responsible. Boundaries are maintained throughout.

8. No Interference With Ongoing Investigation

Telepathic or PK-based impressions are not provided directly to police unless formally requested by legal representatives. The work never attempts to influence, bypass, or interfere with ongoing investigations.

9. Contextual Clarity

Telepathic impressions are always presented within their spiritual context. They are not framed as factual claims, predictions, or authoritative statements. Cold case communication is exploratory, not declarative.

10. Verification Through External Events

Verification is external, not internal. An impression is considered “verified” only when a detail later appears in the real world — through media reporting, official statements, or developments in a case.

11. Transparency With Boundaries

While documentation practices are transparent, only ethically appropriate elements are published. Private or sensitive material is held under restricted access until required or justified.

12. Non-Predictive Stance

Cold case work does not aim to predict outcomes or events. It responds only to impressions as they occur and waits for real-world developments to determine significance.